A creditor with a strong claim can still lose an insolvency petition for one reason: it was filed too late. The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code itself does not set a time limit, but Section 238A applies the Limitation Act, 1963 to proceedings before the NCLT. The Supreme Court has held that an application under Section 7 or Section 9 falls under Article 137 of the Limitation Act, which allows three years from the date the right to apply accrues, that is, from the date of default.
That sounds simple, but most limitation disputes are about what happened in between. A letter from the debtor asking for more time, a part payment, an entry in the company's balance sheet, a one-time settlement offer, or the pandemic period can all change the calculation. This guide explains how limitation works for insolvency petitions, what can extend it, and how to check your own dates.
हिंदी में सारांश
IBC की धारा 238A के तहत लिमिटेशन एक्ट लागू होता है, और सुप्रीम कोर्ट के अनुसार धारा 7 या 9 की याचिका चूक (default) की तारीख से 3 साल के भीतर दायर करनी होती है। कर्ज़दार की लिखित स्वीकृति (acknowledgment) या आंशिक भुगतान, अगर 3 साल पूरे होने से पहले हो, तो समय-सीमा बढ़ जाती है। कंपनी की बैलेंस शीट में दर्ज कर्ज़ भी स्वीकृति माना जा सकता है। COVID के दौरान 15 मार्च 2020 से 28 फरवरी 2022 का समय गिना नहीं जाता।
The rules in brief
Three years from default
Under Article 137, the clock starts when the debt fell due and was not paid.
Acknowledgment restarts the clock
A written, signed acknowledgment of the debt, made before the three years expire, starts a fresh period under Section 18.
Part payment does the same
A payment towards the debt before expiry, shown in writing, starts a fresh period under Section 19.
Balance sheets can count
The Supreme Court held in Bishal Jaiswal (2021) that entries in a company's balance sheet can be acknowledgments.
The COVID period is excluded
The Supreme Court excluded 15 March 2020 to 28 February 2022 from limitation, with a further 90 days in some cases.
Some defaults can never be used
Section 10A bars applications for defaults between 25 March 2020 and 24 March 2021.
When does the clock start?
For a loan, default happens when an instalment of principal or interest falls due and is not paid. Where a loan is recalled, the date of recall can matter. For banks, the date the account was classified as a non-performing asset is often used as a reference point, but the NPA date is not itself the date of default; default usually happened earlier, when payments stopped. The Supreme Court in B.K. Educational Services v Parag Gupta (2018) confirmed that the three-year period runs from the date of default.
For an operational debt, default happens when the invoice fell due and was not paid, which depends on the credit period agreed. Where there are many invoices, each has its own due date, and older invoices may be time-barred even if newer ones are not.
A decree or an arbitral award does not reset the limitation for an insolvency petition on the original debt in every case, but the Supreme Court in Dena Bank v C. Shivakumar Reddy (2021) held that a final judgment or decree for the debt, or a recovery certificate from a DRT, gives a fresh cause of action, so an insolvency application can be filed within three years of it.
Acknowledgments and part payments
Section 18 of the Limitation Act says that if, before the period expires, the debtor acknowledges the liability in writing, signed by the debtor or its agent, a fresh period of limitation starts from the date of the acknowledgment. Section 19 says the same for a payment on account of the debt, made before expiry, if the payment is acknowledged in writing.
Acknowledgments come in many forms: a letter asking for time, an email signed by an authorised person agreeing the balance, a ledger confirmation, a one-time settlement proposal, or a restructuring request. The acknowledgment need not promise to pay; it must recognise that the debt exists. It must be made while the original period is still running. An acknowledgment made after the three years have expired does not revive a time-barred debt under Section 18, though a written promise to pay a time-barred debt can create a new contract under Section 25(3) of the Contract Act.
Balance sheets are a special case. In Asset Reconstruction Company v Bishal Jaiswal (2021), the Supreme Court held that an entry in a company's audited balance sheet showing a debt as owed can amount to an acknowledgment, depending on the facts and any qualifying notes by the auditors. For lenders, this often extends limitation by several years, because companies record their borrowings every year.
How to check whether your petition is in time
Find the date of default
For a loan, the first unpaid instalment or the recall date. For invoices, each due date.
Count three years
Add three years to the date of default to find the original expiry date.
Look for acknowledgments before expiry
Collect every letter, email, ledger confirmation, settlement offer and balance sheet within the period. Each valid one starts a fresh three years.
Check part payments
Note each payment towards the debt, made before expiry and acknowledged in writing.
Apply the COVID exclusion
Exclude the period from 15 March 2020 to 28 February 2022, following the Supreme Court's orders, and allow for the extra 90 days where relevant.
Check Section 10A
If the default occurred between 25 March 2020 and 24 March 2021, it cannot be used for an insolvency application at all. Look for a later default instead.
Common situations and how limitation works
| Situation | Effect on limitation |
|---|---|
| Debtor asks for time by email before expiry | Acknowledgment; fresh three years from the email, if signed or authenticated |
| Ledger confirmation signed by the debtor | Acknowledgment from its date |
| Audited balance sheet shows the loan | Can be an acknowledgment (Bishal Jaiswal), subject to auditor's notes |
| Part payment shown in bank records and acknowledged | Fresh period from the payment (Section 19) |
| One-time settlement proposal by the debtor | Usually an acknowledgment of the debt |
| Acknowledgment made after three years expired | Does not revive the debt under Section 18 |
| DRT recovery certificate or decree | Fresh cause of action for an insolvency application (Dena Bank) |
Defending on limitation
For a corporate debtor, limitation is often the strongest defence, but it needs care. Look at the creditor's own documents: does its date of default match the loan account? Are its claimed acknowledgments really signed by the company, and made before expiry? Does the balance sheet entry carry an auditor's qualification? Is any part of the claim for invoices that are already time-barred? An application can be dismissed as time-barred, or the amount within limitation may fall below Rs 1 crore. Raise limitation at the first opportunity, with a clear table of dates, because tribunals expect it to be pleaded specifically. See defending an insolvency petition.
A balance sheet saves a bank's petition
Here's a made-up example. A bank's term loan to a Ghaziabad company went into default in 2017. The bank filed a Section 7 application in 2023, six years later. The company argued that the claim was time-barred. The bank relied on the company's audited balance sheets for 2018, 2019 and 2020, each showing the loan as owed to the bank, with no qualifying note.
Following Bishal Jaiswal, the NCLT treated each balance sheet as an acknowledgment, made before the previous period expired. The 2020 balance sheet started a fresh three years, and with the COVID exclusion period added, the 2023 application was in time. The application was admitted.
An acknowledgment that came too late
Here's a second made-up example. A supplier's invoices to a Delhi company fell due in 2018. The supplier did nothing until 2022, when the company's director replied to a reminder by email, saying "we accept the balance and will pay soon". The supplier filed a Section 9 application relying on the email.
Even allowing for the COVID exclusion, the three years had expired before the 2022 email. An acknowledgment made after expiry does not restart limitation under Section 18. The NCLT dismissed the application as time-barred. The supplier was left to consider whether the email amounted to a written promise to pay a time-barred debt, which is a separate contractual question for a civil court.
Documents to collect when checking limitation
- Loan agreement or contract showing due dates
- Statement of account or ledger showing the date of default
- Every letter, email or message from the debtor about the debt, with dates
- Ledger confirmations or balance confirmations signed by the debtor
- Audited balance sheets of the debtor for each year since default, with auditors' notes
- Records of part payments and how they were acknowledged
- Any one-time settlement proposals or restructuring requests
- DRT recovery certificates, decrees or awards for the same debt
Personal guarantors and limitation
For personal guarantors, limitation generally runs from the date the guarantee was invoked, not from the borrower's default, because the guarantor's liability arises on invocation under the terms of most guarantee deeds. A lender pursuing a guarantor should check the date and proof of invocation, and any acknowledgments by the guarantor since. A guarantor defending a claim should check whether the guarantee was invoked properly and when. See personal guarantor insolvency explained.
Key rulings on limitation
| Case | What it decided |
|---|---|
| B.K. Educational Services v Parag Gupta (2018) | Article 137 applies; three years from the date of default |
| Babulal Vardharji Gurjar v Veer Gurjar Aluminium (2020) | Reaffirmed that time runs from the date of default and that any acknowledgment relied on must be pleaded |
| Asset Reconstruction Co. v Bishal Jaiswal (2021) | Balance sheet entries can be acknowledgments under Section 18 |
| Dena Bank v C. Shivakumar Reddy (2021) | A decree or recovery certificate gives a fresh cause of action |
| Ramesh Kymal v Siemens Gamesa (2021) | Section 10A bars applications for defaults in the specified COVID period |
Limitation for operational creditors
For suppliers, limitation usually runs separately for each invoice, from its due date. Where an account is running, with regular supplies and payments, tribunals have sometimes treated it as a mutual, open and current account, which can affect how payments are appropriated and when limitation starts. Where payments are not appropriated to specific invoices, Section 60 and 61 of the Contract Act may apply them to the oldest debts first, which can bring older invoices back into time. These points need careful analysis of the ledger, which is why we ask for the complete account history, not just the unpaid invoices.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the time limit to file a Section 7 or 9 petition?
Three years from the date of default, under Article 137 of the Limitation Act, which applies through Section 238A of the IBC.
Does a balance sheet entry extend limitation?
It can. The Supreme Court held in Bishal Jaiswal that a balance sheet entry may be an acknowledgment, depending on the facts.
Does an email asking for more time count?
Usually yes, if it acknowledges the debt and is signed or authenticated by an authorised person, and is sent before expiry.
Can a time-barred debt be revived?
Not by an acknowledgment after expiry under Section 18. A written promise to pay can create a new contract, which is a separate question.
What about the COVID period?
The Supreme Court excluded 15 March 2020 to 28 February 2022 from limitation calculations.
Can defaults during COVID be used?
No. Defaults between 25 March 2020 and 24 March 2021 are barred by Section 10A.
Does the NPA date start the limitation?
Not necessarily. The date of default usually comes earlier. The NPA date is a reference, not the trigger.
Does a DRT recovery certificate help?
Yes. The Supreme Court held in Dena Bank that it gives a fresh cause of action for an insolvency application within three years.
Worried Your Claim Is Out of Time?
Send us the loan or invoice papers and every letter, email and payment record. We will work out the dates and tell you plainly where you stand.
This page gives general information about the law as it stood when it was last reviewed. It is not legal advice on your case and does not promise any result. IBC rules and NCLT procedures change often, so outcomes depend on your own documents, dates and facts.
Have a question about your own case?
Send us the notice, the petition or the order. We will tell you where you stand, which bench hears it and the date the next step is due, in plain words.